Re: [ambient-light] Drop own powerful feature, require active local video source. (#83)

> > So what's the mechanics of "require there to be at least one local video source that is not muted or stopped"? From as user's point of view is the query overtly about the camera?
> 
> From a user's point of view the idea is that this represents a camera, or something akin to it that also causes browsers to show an indicator to users that video capture is happening and that fulfills the `{video: true}` constraint when it is passed to `getUserMedia()`.

OK. In other words - the webpage is capturing the video, anyway, is that right? There may be a some constraints as 'where the camera is pointing and whether it's the same direction as ALS', but it's probably not necessary to go in such details.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by lknik
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/ambient-light/pull/83#issuecomment-1386555111 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 06:28:59 UTC