Re: [ambient-light] Drop own powerful feature, require active local video source. (#83)

I've pushed a few changes to the Use Cases and Examples sections to remove the bits that do not make sense with the new camera requirement. The Use Cases list got quite small, so I'd appreciate it if people (like @willmorgan for example :-) could help think of a few more ideas to add there.

This addresses most of @noamr's points. IMO the remaining ones are "users do not know where their ambient light sensor is located" and "expose illuminance as a new MediaStreamTrack". I feel like doing the latter wouldn't help with the former. I couldn't find any examples of new MediaStreamTrack types that are not video or audio (unless I misunderstood the suggestion), and it is still unclear how to deal with prompting users if we do that.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rakuco
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/ambient-light/pull/83#issuecomment-1387438390 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 17:17:40 UTC