public-device-apis-log@w3.org from September 2020 by author

Adrian via GitHub

Re: [system-wake-lock] Request for System Wake Lock use cases (#4) (Tuesday, 29 September)
Re: [system-wake-lock] Privacy consideration about tracking location (#3) (Tuesday, 29 September)

Alastair via GitHub

Re: [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) (Thursday, 24 September)
[geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) (Thursday, 24 September)

Alice via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add explainer to the spec repo (#284) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Closed: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [system-wake-lock] Privacy consideration about tracking location (#3) (Tuesday, 29 September)
[system-wake-lock] Request for System Wake Lock use cases (#4) (Tuesday, 29 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Friday, 25 September)
Closed: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) (Thursday, 24 September)
Closed: [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Thursday, 17 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Wednesday, 16 September)

David Chadwick via GitHub

[screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) (Thursday, 3 September)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Wednesday, 23 September)

Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Update the Changes section (#290) (Monday, 28 September)
[geolocation-api] Add explainer to the spec repo (#59) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Thursday, 17 September)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) (Tuesday, 29 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] chore: add lang="en" (#289) (Monday, 28 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) (Monday, 21 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) (Monday, 21 September)

Peter Donald via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] Ensure the release operation is valid WebIDL (#283) (Thursday, 10 September)

Philippe Coval via GitHub

Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) (Wednesday, 23 September)

Pranjal Jumde via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) (Friday, 25 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) (Tuesday, 22 September)
Closed: [screen-wake-lock] Do not use allow="screen-wake-lock" for iframes (#277) (Tuesday, 22 September)

Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Reword the Security and Privacy Considerations section. (#287) (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Do not use allow="screen-wake-lock" for iframes (#277) (Tuesday, 22 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) (Tuesday, 22 September)
Closed: [screen-wake-lock] Add explainer to the spec repo (#284) (Monday, 21 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) (Monday, 21 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) (Saturday, 19 September)
Closed: [screen-wake-lock] Hide failure to acquire a screen wake lock (#247) (Saturday, 19 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Stop checking if "acquire the wake lock" succeeds. (#285) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Closed: [screen-wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests (#111) (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests (#111) (Tuesday, 15 September)
[screen-wake-lock] Add explainer to the spec repo (#284) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Reilly Grant via GitHub

Re: [system-wake-lock] Request for System Wake Lock use cases (#4) (Tuesday, 29 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) (Monday, 28 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Stop checking if "acquire the wake lock" succeeds. (#285) (Friday, 18 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: [screen-wake-lock] Ensure the release operation is valid WebIDL (#283) (Thursday, 10 September)

Robert Linder via GitHub

Re: [battery] Detect power saving mode (#9) (Monday, 7 September)

Thomas Steiner via GitHub

Re: [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) (Tuesday, 15 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 13:33:45 UTC