W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288)

From: Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:22:41 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-701387264-1601472160-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
#291 makes `type` optional since most people seem to favor this approach.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rakuco
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/screen-wake-lock/pull/288#issuecomment-701387264 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2020 13:22:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:58 UTC