W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > September 2020

Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288)

From: Marcos Cáceres via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:43:59 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-698077627-1600915438-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> I think it's reasonable to make type an optional parameter with a default of "screen". I said as much on the PR where system wake locks were split out.

Agree. Defaulting to "screen" seems totally reasonable. 

GitHub Notification of comment by marcoscaceres
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/screen-wake-lock/pull/288#issuecomment-698077627 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2020 02:44:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:58 UTC