- From: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:19:17 +0200
- To: Andrea Trasatti <atrasatti@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: public-ddr-vocab@w3.org, public-ddwg@w3.org
- Message-id: <fa4e6a981692.1692fa4e6a98@tid.es>
Hi, As a follow-up of my proposal on "subproperties", and taking into account that the MIME type is bound to a media, What about something like ddr.getProperty("supportedImageFormats").get("gif").getProperty("MIMEType") Best Regards ---- José Manuel Cantera Fonseca Telefónica I+D ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Andrea Trasatti <atrasatti@mtld.mobi> Fecha: Lunes, Octubre 1, 2007 5:58 pm Asunto: [VOC] MIME Types Para: public-ddr-vocab@w3.org CC: public-ddwg@w3.org > > While working on the Core Vocabulary and trying to represent the > new > proposed structure of properties as sets of values I wondered about > > MIME Types. > There are some markups or image formats that share the same MIME > Type, think of application/xml (all XHTML) or image/gif (any type > of > GIF image), but there are some contents that might have more than > one > MIME Type, think of XHTML that can be associated with > application/xml > and also text/html or JPEG images that are often served as > image/jpg > and image/jpeg and the same with MPEG and MP3 files. > > How should we represent these? Should these be strings (so list > only > the preferred one in case of multiple) or should they be sets of > values or ordered lists? An ordered list would allow us to have > multiple values and at the same time define which is the preferred > MIME Type to use. > jpegMimeType would then be 'image/jpg, image/jpeg' where the first > is > the preferred one. > > This seems to me the best approach but would fall down into > requiring > a property for every type thus canceling the advantage of using > something like "imageFormat" as a property to list all supported > image formats. > > I think we need some feedback from those individuals and companies > that already worked with these data structures for their vocabularies. > > - Andrea > >
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 21:19:38 UTC