shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/218 Raised by: Holger Knublauch On product: SHACL - SPARQL Hi Dimitris, I believe you were the main proponent of the injection mechanism for annotation properties into validation results (sh:annotationProperty etc). Given the time line and complexity (e.g. the issue with mapping variable names to properties) I would suggest to remove them from the standardization track. They could be added into the WG note. Nothing depends on them.Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 01:36:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:39 UTC