- From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:07:42 +0300
- To: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 11:08:39 UTC
Currently, we have a big terminology section that tries to describe most parts of SHACL from start. However, we have dedicated sections for most of the terms introduced in the terminology, e.g. shapes, targets, filters, constraints, validation, etc and there is some repetition in some definition and backwards references to the terminology section through respec I suggest we keep the basic terminology (e.g. from "Basic RDF Terminology" until "SHACL Instance") and try to integrate the rest in the spec. Any ideas, comments? Best, Dimitris -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http://aligned-project.eu Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 11:08:39 UTC