- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:04:17 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Dimitris, I have comments on the content of those sections that I have been working on. I may start posting them rather than complete the section. However, I do agree that integrating the definitions where the term is first used would be more helpful to readers. kc On 10/3/16 4:07 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: > Currently, we have a big terminology section that tries to describe most > parts of SHACL from start. > > However, we have dedicated sections for most of the terms introduced in > the terminology, e.g. shapes, targets, filters, constraints, validation, > etc and there is some repetition in some definition and backwards > references to the terminology section through respec > > I suggest we keep the basic terminology (e.g. from "Basic RDF > Terminology" until "SHACL Instance") and try to integrate the rest in > the spec. > > Any ideas, comments? > > Best, > Dimitris > -- > Dimitris Kontokostas > Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association > Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, > http://aligned-project.eu > Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas > Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 15:04:56 UTC