Re: shapes-ISSUE-136 (Property pair names): Can we clarify the names of property pair constraint types? [SHACL - Core]

It would be good to get the concept of "value of the property" in there. 
It isn't the property that is equal, it's the value of the property. So 
something like:

sh:equalValue
sh:notEqualValue
sh:valueLessThan
sh:valueLessThanOrEqual

kc

On 3/13/16 4:13 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-136 (Property pair names): Can we clarify the names of property pair constraint types? [SHACL - Core]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/136
>
> Raised by: Holger Knublauch
> On product: SHACL - Core
>
> We currently use the following terms to represent relationships between properties:
>
> sh:equals (?predicate has same values as the other property)
> sh:notEquals (?predicate has different values...)
> sh:lessThan (all values of ?predicate must be less than values of other property)
> sh:lessThanOrEquals ( <= )
>
> I believe it is too easy for a reader to assume that the values of these properties are not other properties but constants, e.g. "must be less than 10". But for that we already have sh:maxExclusive etc.
>
> We should consider renaming to something like
>
> sh:equalProperty
> sh:notEqualProperty
> sh:lessThanProperty
> sh:lessThanOrEqualProperty
>
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 00:40:12 UTC