- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:12:54 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Proposals listed, others welcome: https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Proposals#ISSUE-136:_Property_pair_names Something with "valueSet" may also work. Holger On 14/03/2016 10:40, Karen Coyle wrote: > It would be good to get the concept of "value of the property" in > there. It isn't the property that is equal, it's the value of the > property. So something like: > > sh:equalValue > sh:notEqualValue > sh:valueLessThan > sh:valueLessThanOrEqual > > kc > > On 3/13/16 4:13 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> shapes-ISSUE-136 (Property pair names): Can we clarify the names of >> property pair constraint types? [SHACL - Core] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/136 >> >> Raised by: Holger Knublauch >> On product: SHACL - Core >> >> We currently use the following terms to represent relationships >> between properties: >> >> sh:equals (?predicate has same values as the other property) >> sh:notEquals (?predicate has different values...) >> sh:lessThan (all values of ?predicate must be less than values of >> other property) >> sh:lessThanOrEquals ( <= ) >> >> I believe it is too easy for a reader to assume that the values of >> these properties are not other properties but constants, e.g. "must >> be less than 10". But for that we already have sh:maxExclusive etc. >> >> We should consider renaming to something like >> >> sh:equalProperty >> sh:notEqualProperty >> sh:lessThanProperty >> sh:lessThanOrEqualProperty >> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 09:13:27 UTC