W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:40:30 +1000
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56E2220E.3070500@topquadrant.com>
Yes, pre-binding has always been used in SPIN.

Holger


On 11/03/2016 3:38, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Is something like pre-binding needed in SPIN?
>
> peter
>
> On 03/08/2016 10:06 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> I had updated the definition of pre-binding but forgot to send an email to the
>> list:
>>
>> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-constraints-prebound
>>
>> I believe we need implementer's feedback to see whether that definition is
>> clear and precise enough, but that applies to everything in the current draft,
>> so I hope we can live with that definition for now and close the ticket.
>>
>> HTH
>> Holger
>>
>>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 01:41:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC