- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:40:30 +1000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Yes, pre-binding has always been used in SPIN. Holger On 11/03/2016 3:38, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Is something like pre-binding needed in SPIN? > > peter > > On 03/08/2016 10:06 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> I had updated the definition of pre-binding but forgot to send an email to the >> list: >> >> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-constraints-prebound >> >> I believe we need implementer's feedback to see whether that definition is >> clear and precise enough, but that applies to everything in the current draft, >> so I hope we can live with that definition for now and close the ticket. >> >> HTH >> Holger >> >>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 01:41:04 UTC