- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:38:07 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Is something like pre-binding needed in SPIN? peter On 03/08/2016 10:06 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I had updated the definition of pre-binding but forgot to send an email to the > list: > > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-constraints-prebound > > I believe we need implementer's feedback to see whether that definition is > clear and precise enough, but that applies to everything in the current draft, > so I hope we can live with that definition for now and close the ticket. > > HTH > Holger > >
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:38:46 UTC