W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:11:44 +0000
Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A1692506-35DB-4257-8DE8-184FBB8E30B8@cyganiak.de>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>

> On 26 Mar 2015, at 15:36, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> As W3C Staff, this would be my preferred approach as it allows core to
> proceed to REC without dependencies on (i.e. multiple interoperable
> implementations of) templates and SPARQL integration.

As W3C staff, what obstacles do you foresee on the road to REC for templates and SPARQL integration, that motivate this preference?

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 17:12:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC