W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:36:44 -0400
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20150326153643.GA29198@w3.org>
* Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> [2015-03-25 18:36-0700]
> There has been a lot (!) of discussion on the mailing list and I'd like to 
> get an update on where the WG stands with regard to the different 
> approaches being proposed. I know this doesn't capture all the issues 
> (obviously) and some will feel that this isn't the right question but at 
> least this is one point of contention that we need to address so, please, 
> bear with me.
> 
> Rather than doing this just on a teleconference I set up a wiki page so 
> that who can't attend the teleconference can still respond:
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Strawpoll_On_Approach

The choices listed there are:

a. 1 doc: (vocab, extensions, semantics) with profiles
b. n docs: 1 vocab, 1+ for extensions, semantics

I have the impression that folks wanted the core semantics, with or
without SPARQL, separated from the templates and SPARQL extensions:

c. SHACL shall be made of multiple documents: one document which only
   defines the higher-level language constructs (provides semantics),
   and other documents which define the rest: templates and extension
   mechanism.

As W3C Staff, this would be my preferred approach as it allows core to
proceed to REC without dependencies on (i.e. multiple interoperable
implementations of) templates and SPARQL integration.


> Thank you.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
> IBM Software Group

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:36:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC