Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL

* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-03-26 08:39-0700]
> Option c gets a -2 from me.

interesting, why?


> peter
> 
> 
> On 03/26/2015 08:36 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > * Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> [2015-03-25 18:36-0700]
> >> There has been a lot (!) of discussion on the mailing list and I'd like
> >> to get an update on where the WG stands with regard to the different 
> >> approaches being proposed. I know this doesn't capture all the issues 
> >> (obviously) and some will feel that this isn't the right question but
> >> at least this is one point of contention that we need to address so,
> >> please, bear with me.
> >> 
> >> Rather than doing this just on a teleconference I set up a wiki page so
> >>  that who can't attend the teleconference can still respond: 
> >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Strawpoll_On_Approach
> > 
> > The choices listed there are:
> > 
> > a. 1 doc: (vocab, extensions, semantics) with profiles b. n docs: 1
> > vocab, 1+ for extensions, semantics
> > 
> > I have the impression that folks wanted the core semantics, with or 
> > without SPARQL, separated from the templates and SPARQL extensions:
> > 
> > c. SHACL shall be made of multiple documents: one document which only 
> > defines the higher-level language constructs (provides semantics), and
> > other documents which define the rest: templates and extension 
> > mechanism.
> > 
> > As W3C Staff, this would be my preferred approach as it allows core to 
> > proceed to REC without dependencies on (i.e. multiple interoperable 
> > implementations of) templates and SPARQL integration.
> > 
> > 
> >> Thank you. -- Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web
> >> Technologies - IBM Software Group
> > 

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:58:41 UTC