- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:32:41 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/25/15 4:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I am rather puzzled as to how https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ is > based on SPIN templates as opposed to plain SPARQL. +1 the SPARQL queries in https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-template-defs can easily be used for different purposes without any deep understanding of templates. The only thing people need to understand is - in those SPARQL queries, certain variables such as ?minCount are the input from the constraints - the variable ?this represents the focus node. I have set those pre-bound variables to a blue font to clarify their special role. - the result variables such as ?root and ?path represent the constructed errors Holger > > peter > > > On 03/24/2015 11:30 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > [...] >> One thing I wonder is whether the fact that the semantics of the higher >> level constructs in Holger's proposal are actually based on SPIN >> templates rather than plain SPARQL isn't adding to the confusion and >> negative reaction by some. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff >> Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Software Group > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVEa8AAAoJECjN6+QThfjzrLoIAJ7EJQ3+BaCpYjTz494hT+lY > A6eA6l7HEJMfLaAPu/9FmekzNkr/rECaJ13caaNVC8efuSO/uk9tSeV5lQltRDxG > HopWi9RE1B4WcxHbGyCx/QbS4h+hTDIZDpVSMSNTc8JRL4GgigHt9dGsC0AbYZPU > tZ7KPG1OIH+/o1EShAQCz71ZbzIcDOAeqlaYLuwIqib/ir3fTJdXAn9ZNbihLgrZ > ypw86Y2INrJbWkz01rVdTywCorthphqy9jF6NKOy5Vo6qRoBa0ABwmSRzzExlXUX > fWhMAWFiRuIxgAWMQyYkIleNQcY/SRsSK4ZK6IvYX5CyiejvmnqF90vNkH7Ut9Q= > =yhB9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 23:33:14 UTC