W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Comments on draft #3

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:09 +1000
Message-ID: <5510B2E1.7090409@topquadrant.com>
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org

On 3/24/15 4:18 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Holger, I do like those examples. They still need instance data.

Instance data is present in "EXAMPLE 2: Sample Issue instances with 
resulting constraint violations" if you scroll a bit further down. Is 
this not clear enough?

> In spite of this, the first audience described by Arthur is still not 
> served in this draft. You may not have a strong idea of how the 
> document should address that audience; if that's the case, then 
> perhaps some others of us could draw up some content for that section. 
> It shouldn't all be on you, after all!

I'd be happy to receive input and diffs on any aspect of the document. 
Much of my prose is very brief, as I thought would be best for a formal 
specification. While we can certainly make it more readable for 
beginners, I don't see this becoming a tutorial (if that's what you are 
referring to).

Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 00:42:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC