- From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 07:06:33 -0500
- To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dean Allemang <dallemang@workingontologist.com>, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
<Because "SPARQL queries cannot easily be inspected and understood, either by human beings or by machines, to uncover the constraints that are to be respected". [1]> I believe this has already been addressed by SHACL. Further, at this point, we should be working from requirements, not from the workshop results. The working group supersedes previous requirements work by either turning whatever has been said before its start into its set of accepted requirements or not. If you think there is a missing requirement, propose it. Then, it could be reviewed, shared understanding formed, accepted and the solution evaluated against it. > On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:59 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com> wrote: > > Because "SPARQL queries cannot easily be inspected and understood, either by human beings or by machines, to uncover the constraints that are to be respected". [1]
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 12:07:04 UTC