W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: The NoSPARQL use case

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:37:11 +1000
Message-ID: <54F39497.3050600@topquadrant.com>
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org

On 3/2/15 1:53 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> I can imagine a situation where the technology around the data is 
> minimal and the only requirements are min/max on properties. An 
> example of this could be Hydra, which uses JSON-LD:
>   http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/spec/latest/core/

See

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Nov/0049.html

The idea was that Hydra can be combined with more expressive languages, 
so they don't have to reinvent the wheel - Ruben mentions OWL. He (and 
others in that group) also state that he is looking forward to combining 
Hydra with Shapes.

Holger
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2015 22:37:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC