Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 06/18/2015 03:07 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> I suggest we split the topic into several resolutions:
> 
> 
> Proposal 1: SHACL should include a property sh:sparqlEntailment that can
> be used to specify a required inferencing level for each SPARQL query,
> as described in
> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-entailment

Why would this only be for SPARQL?   If an entailment regime is used, it
should be used for all relevant SHACL constructs, such as sh:valueType.

> Proposal 2: sh:valueType must also match subclasses, with its SPARQL 
> implementation using rdfs:subClassOf* as described in 
> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-AbstractValueTypePropertyConstraint

The
> 
SPARQL implementation does not match how subclasses are defined in any
existing W3C specification, assuming that the recipe is exhaustive.

> Proposal 3: SHACL shall include another property sh:directValueType that
> only matches the directly asserted types (for OSLC use case).

What is the definition supporting "directly asserted"?

> Proposal 4: sh:scopeClass must also include instances of subclasses, with
> its SPARQL implementation using rdfs:subClassOf*

The SPARQL implementation does not match how subclasses are defined in any
existing W3C specification, assuming that the recipe is exhaustive.

> Proposal 5: SHACL shall include a high-level mechanism to express the
> scope of direct instances. (Details on that depend on our resolution to
> the general scoping topic - I hope we allow templates there).

What is "scope of direct instances"?

> Holger


peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJViwk1AAoJECjN6+QThfjztnkH/1XKjOcWqJyzXj5PjtXm2KRL
0/+coQdR1FjSXin1ca8yRiDSaaT8wrBJ6YDtmKsUmx7aFDpviP9JY9jgBdlUOqum
on0quUs4DPMibwrY8Rj+joZghlocFcFAYV8NSjdGiSJzq8LJaUC+i58cc7zJ38QN
Zq6cMQQNjoeWIjHSqMPxQ+/Growqi+VEnPdlmc6KWbmrOC0WZmytSujTSxUdB583
TeT1BgkKIogRsxlKf/T5VHyk8BDirnUnWSDcAsU8fVdlPMJIEH/5iGAw526G1uSD
JSRNDfg8H1XTeYTPcZ7SWGJPH5cBkVeUdt+v8VCWVoiN5NXNKlJQkyeQA3P1aoE=
=3Hfk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2015 19:47:43 UTC