>From my point of view a W3C spec should strive for convergence and not diversity. We already have core + sparql. Now we want to break sparql into two modes and maybe javascript in another x modes in the future. I will certainly not block going into this direction but will not endorse it either. These are entirely different setups, for different user groups. This is not > a one-size-fits-all discussion. If the SPARQL endpoint people don't need > access to ?shapesGraph, SHACL functions, recursion and blank nodes then > fine for me, but they should not block the dataset people from covering > their use cases. > Besides ?shapesGraph I never mentioned blank nodes or shacl functions (which I am close to implementing). I already said I don't support recursion it but it's a big way from not supporting to blocking. Thanks, Dimitris -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://http://aligned-project.eu, http://rdfunit.aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Friday, 19 June 2015 20:36:19 UTC