- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 03:20:08 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 05/31/2015 11:00 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Hi Peter, > > thanks for starting to bring structure into the suggested refactorings > (also in your later email). I do believe we need to tackle them one by > one, and break them into separate ISSUEs. So below are some references to > tickets (I raised a few of them recently): > On the contrary, I believe that tackling these issues one by one will end up with something that does not have a clean conceptual basis and thus that will be hard to understand and that it will be hard to determine whether the result is reasonable. I thus strongly feel that there first needs to be a determination of what the foundations of SHACL will be. peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVbDHYAAoJECjN6+QThfjzwDYIALCqQGa+rfEeORiI0tXhB5xG VKSYGXDd7Ep7qJlvsPBLkunpKZE/XjBi1P2EMD92WQAvC9jI4MkkbsG/ThqB8VFZ iOstJFclKeu9qx7ajgXEk6w2AAaMp9Pgmh9LiaHhreax06Tc6HFd2Gv7fSm1Amqt VFBWlsKJAu0uzUXFnogn4F9wjwHr2ygwwOJDI7FkXOX/RrgSQOW7dUfXE0LoyASc bhCEgERokyeHqSDZRmSyYv2Mac4YWIGnqdVA5Qpfe+C4caoPqMm/JYjH35Jln5E4 e+VozvH3BxA7+oJaqyZ7otnzJdYvljh0iu87r3B0c6C4/CDznwV6LqF7y2vDEeo= =7J8v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 10:20:43 UTC