- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:29:36 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 7/29/2015 0:46, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > ISSUE-29 is about how to specify the meaning of SHACL high-level constructs. It was already decided to use SPARQL as much as possible. I therefore think that only the sub-issues mentioned below remain. (Just trying to remove formal work items). Holger > I do not see that the issues mentioned below have anything to say on this topic. > > peter > > > On 07/27/2015 04:48 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Ticket 29 [1] was supposed to provide guidance on the high-level direction of >> SHACL. I believe the ticket has now been split into sufficiently precise >> sub-topics, esp ISSUE-47, ISSUE-63, ISSUE-66 and ISSUE-52 so that (in the >> interest of making actionable progress) ISSUE-29 should be closed. >> >> Holger >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/29 >>
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:30:12 UTC