- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:46:45 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
ISSUE-29 is about how to specify the meaning of SHACL high-level constructs. I do not see that the issues mentioned below have anything to say on this topic. peter On 07/27/2015 04:48 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Ticket 29 [1] was supposed to provide guidance on the high-level direction of > SHACL. I believe the ticket has now been split into sufficiently precise > sub-topics, esp ISSUE-47, ISSUE-63, ISSUE-66 and ISSUE-52 so that (in the > interest of making actionable progress) ISSUE-29 should be closed. > > Holger > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/29 >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 14:47:25 UTC