- From: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 08:36:27 +0100
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> There is no explicit user story for this yet. Shall I add a new User > Story for this? The entry above points at some public examples that I > could elaborate on. Although we already have freezed the creation of user stories, I would really appreciate it! cheers, simon --- Dipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-01-10 00:10, schrieb Holger Knublauch: > Based on the (long!) discussions about the IRI or Blank Node issue, I > have added a new requirement > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Requirements#Declarations_of_Property_Node_Type_.28e.g._only_IRIs_are_allowed.29 > > that would extend the expressivity of property declarations so that > properties can be narrowed down to only have IRIs, or only blank nodes > or IRIs etc. I think this is useful no matter what the outcome on the > :valueType issue is. > > There is no explicit user story for this yet. Shall I add a new User > Story for this? The entry above points at some public examples that I > could elaborate on. > > Thanks, > Holger
Received on Saturday, 10 January 2015 07:36:53 UTC