- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:43:34 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Hi Karen, I have added two preamble paragraphs that may help set the stage of what is intended. https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shape_Selectors Please follow up with questions if you have any. HTH Holger On 2/12/2015 9:42, Karen Coyle wrote: > Holger, I find this to be a bit sparse of explanations. I know that > it's easier to produce code than lots of verbiage, but I, for one, > would appreciate a more ample natural language description of what is > intended. > > Thanks, > kc > > On 2/10/15 3:43 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> I have just pushed a new "meta" feature to the LDOM system vocabulary >> that can be used to represent which properties shall be used to drive >> the LDOM engine. This is an attempt to formalize and generalize the >> issue of classes-vs-shapes into a solution that everyone could live >> with. >> >> Here are the details: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shape_Selectors >> >> I believe this offers the maximum flexibility so that platforms can pick >> which properties (such as oslc:instanceShape/oslc:classShape) they would >> like to use. This approach allows applications to pick whether they want >> backward-compatibility with RDFS classes or use stand-alone shapes, or >> even both! >> >> Any feedback? >> >> Thanks, >> Holger >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 05:44:18 UTC