Re: Shape Selectors

Holger, I find this to be a bit sparse of explanations. I know that it's 
easier to produce code than lots of verbiage, but I, for one, would 
appreciate a more ample natural language description of what is intended.

Thanks,
kc

On 2/10/15 3:43 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> I have just pushed a new "meta" feature to the LDOM system vocabulary
> that can be used to represent which properties shall be used to drive
> the LDOM engine. This is an attempt to formalize and generalize the
> issue of classes-vs-shapes into a solution that everyone could live with.
>
> Here are the details:
>
>      https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shape_Selectors
>
> I believe this offers the maximum flexibility so that platforms can pick
> which properties (such as oslc:instanceShape/oslc:classShape) they would
> like to use. This approach allows applications to pick whether they want
> backward-compatibility with RDFS classes or use stand-alone shapes, or
> even both!
>
> Any feedback?
>
> Thanks,
> Holger
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 23:43:16 UTC