Re: F2F draft agenda

Dear all,

IMHO the following two issues should be tackled soon and ideally in the F2F
meeting

1) Technology name [1].
Right now some people use ldom others try to refer to the technology with
an abstract name and as Holger mentioned earlier, until we fix this we
cannot make any discussions easily searchable

2) Core shapes definition, referring to how we define "Constraints/Shapes
on Properties" (based on the latest iteration)
Again for the same reason,  people post examples in different formats or
some avoid to write due to confusion.
I made a draft page [2] where others can extend with alternative options
and all could vote.

Maybe these topics can be included in the agenda of related sessions

Best,
Dimitris


[1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Technology_Name
[2] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Core_Shape_Definition

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I put together a first draft agenda for next week's meeting. I would
> appreciate if you could have a look and provide feedback.
> Of course this is just a starting point and we will adjust based on how
> things go but we've got to have something to start with.
>
> For that matter I'm primarily interested in topics that are simply missing
> altogether and that should be on the list of what we need to cover at the
> meeting. The details of when things get discussed isn't as critical,
> although, as I said before if those who plan to participate remotely have
> special requests let me know and I'll try to accommodate.
>
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/F2F2
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM
> Software Group
>



-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas