- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:50:36 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Hi! > I've edit a bit more heavily. It seems there are now some rspec errors -> [TypeError] $(...).allTextNodes is not a function ⊞ [TypeError] y.find(...).renameElement is not a function ⊞ [TypeError] e.makeID is not a function ⊞ [TypeError] n.makeID is not a function ⊞ > LDOM (Lasagna Dumplings and Ostrich Meatballs) made me chuckle :D simon --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-02-06 10:44, schrieb Eric Prud'hommeaux: > * Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> [2015-02-04 18:41-0500] >> Last week, we discussed a version of LDOM which separates shapes from >> classes: >> >> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-primer/no-class-templates > > I've edit a bit more heavily. Peter, can you see if the current draft > works for you? I think I was able to remove notion of modeling without > preventing folks who think of it as modeling from understanding the > doc. > > >> It also, as the name implies, has no templates. They're in their own >> document now: >> >> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-primer/templates >> >> -- >> -ericP >> >> office: +1.617.599.3509 >> mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59 >> >> (eric@w3.org) >> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other >> than >> email address distribution. >> >> There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout >> which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper. >>
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 09:51:04 UTC