Re: Language Tags Requirement

Sorry, Jose, for possibly appearing pedantic, but this is not how I 
understood the vote that took place yesterday. I thought the vote was 
about splitting the requirement into two, and then vote on the spawned 
off requirement separately. As defined right now, I have no idea what 
this requirement is supposed to do, and I would prefer a better definition.

Does it mean that the high-level vocabulary shall include something like

ex:MyGermanAddressShape
     sh:property [
         sh:predicate ex:strasse ;
         sh:lang "de"
     ] .

and then all values of ex:strasse must carry the language tag "de"?

If so, is this a common enough use case that needs to go into the Core 
vocab? Let's keep in mind that the Core is expected to be supported by a 
wide array of tools. I see no technical problems supporting this, yet I 
wonder where to draw the line, or whether such things should rather go 
into some extension library of Core. For example the requirement that 
there should be no two values with the same language tag appears to me 
much more common.

Thanks for clarification.
Holger


On 4/25/15 4:02 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Hi Jose,
> You don't need to create another issue for this. I expect the editors 
> to pick it up and include it in their draft as part of their normal 
> activities.
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies 
> - IBM Software Group
>
>
> Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com> wrote on 04/23/2015 
> 10:26:46 PM:
>
> > From: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
> > To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> > Date: 04/23/2015 10:28 PM
> > Subject: Language Tags Requirement
> >
> > As per my action from yesterday's WG telecon, I have created a new
> > requirement in the Wiki called Language Tags:
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Requirements#Language_Tags
>
> > As I understand that the requirement has been approved, Should it
> > also be added to the FPWD or should I add another Issue to ask for
> > its inclusion?
> >
> > --
> > -- Jose Labra