- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:15:16 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
"Facet" is used throughout the document. If it doesn't have a specific meaning then I suggest dropping it. kc On 4/3/15 5:16 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Karen, sorry - the term facet is just a red herring here and I didn't > need to introduce it. The corresponding properties all have sections in > the spec, e.g. sh:valueType at > > https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractValueTypePropertyConstraint > > > Hope this clarifies what I meant: constraint properties used by the core > vocabulary. > > Holger > > > On 4/4/15 2:55 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: >> Holger, before responding to this, I need to know what you mean by >> "facet" since in my professional vocabulary it has a specific meaning >> that doesn't fit here. Either a definition or a representative example >> or two. >> >> Thanks, >> kc >> >> On 4/2/15 4:18 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL >>> Spec] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/36 >>> >>> Raised by: Holger Knublauch >>> On product: SHACL Spec >>> >>> See https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Facet_Property_Names >>> >>> How should the facet property for value types be called? Please cast >>> your vote on the page linked above. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2015 14:15:45 UTC