- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:16:35 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Karen, sorry - the term facet is just a red herring here and I didn't need to introduce it. The corresponding properties all have sections in the spec, e.g. sh:valueType at https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractValueTypePropertyConstraint Hope this clarifies what I meant: constraint properties used by the core vocabulary. Holger On 4/4/15 2:55 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Holger, before responding to this, I need to know what you mean by > "facet" since in my professional vocabulary it has a specific meaning > that doesn't fit here. Either a definition or a representative example > or two. > > Thanks, > kc > > On 4/2/15 4:18 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL >> Spec] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/36 >> >> Raised by: Holger Knublauch >> On product: SHACL Spec >> >> See https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Facet_Property_Names >> >> How should the facet property for value types be called? Please cast >> your vote on the page linked above. >> >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2015 00:17:08 UTC