- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:47:36 -0500
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
There are a few motivations for decoupling shapes and classes. One is that the creation shape may be different than the update shape. Another has to do with custom properties. I'll write up the following in the wiki. OSLC supports an open content model for resources. It is common for tools to add their own custom properties, and for projects within a tool to have different user-defined properties. For example, consider a bug tracking tool. Project A may add a custom property foo and project B may add bar. All projects use the same RDF type for bug resources, e.g. oslc_cm:ChangeRequest. However, the shape for resources in project A differs for the shape for project B. _________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman Chief Data Officer SWG | Rational 905.413.3077 (phone) | 416.939.5063 (cell) IBM InterConnect 2015
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 21:48:10 UTC