- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:00:51 -0500
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOUJ7Jo-Ak9Vs1X5oGpFEM-sroSHuweop9-VR7tqAWH9J13Dow@mail.gmail.com>
As a reference, in the LDP WG the LDP Use Case and Requirements doc defined clearly upfront [1] what we meant and how we organized things as it was a source of confusion on what people meant by what. [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp-ucr/#organization-of-this-document Thanks, Steve Speicher http://stevespeicher.me On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > I am unclear about the distinction between User Stories and Use Cases. I > am trying to get to a place where we can compare specific technologies, and > establish whether scenario X would be covered by technology Y or not. I > therefore suggested we create separate pages for each Story (or Use Case) > because we will probably need specific examples of SPARQL queries, OWL > expressions, ShEx etc and this requires space. For example S5 is too high > level to serve that purpose. I have created a specific Use Case with more > details for it: > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/EPIM_ReportingHub > > All this is probably best discussed in the next meeting. > > Holger > > > > On 11/5/2014 7:34, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > > We agreed at the meeting that we should move the User Stories that we > captured on the piratepad during the meeting to a wiki page so everybody > could keep working on them, I took the action item to make that move and > have now done so: > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories > > I don't know whether what you started should be folded into that, Ralph > suggested at the meeting that we could not develop use cases if we have > stories. I'd rather we minimize the number of different documents we have > to manage. Eventually we will want to publish one Note with all our use > cases and requirements so I think we might as well start that way. > > I also suggest all comments be sent to the mailing list rather than using > the Discussion tab of the wiki. Otherwise it becomes really difficult to > keep track of everything. > > Thanks. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM > Software Group > > > Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote > on 11/04/2014 03:05:39 AM: > > > From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> <holger@topquadrant.com> > > To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > > Date: 11/04/2014 03:08 AM > > Subject: Use Cases wiki pages > > > > I took the liberty to start a couple of wiki pages to capture Use Cases > > > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Use_Cases > > > > It currently only links to two stories, which are incomplete - I plan to > > fill in more details tomorrow. I just thought I use this opportunity to > > get the ball rolling. > > > > I suggest we create one page for each of the stories collected in the > > pirate pad during the meeting, and others that seem relevant. Having a > > separate page for each should provide enough room to thoroughly discuss > > and annotate each story. > > > > I hope this makes sense... if it does, should there be a link to that > > Use_Cases page from the main page? > > > > Holger > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:01:18 UTC