Re: Timing questions

On Oct 27, 2015, at 4:04 AM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm pleased to say that this morning I made a PR to report that my implementations are passing all the tests, so we now have 2 full implementations of everything. I believe that means we can go ahead with the transition whenever suits.
> 
Congratulations, Jeni!

Gregg
> I'll let the group know re the call.
> 
> Jeni
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, 09:40 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>> Ping Jeni - any news?
>> 
>> BTW Ivan, Jeremy and I are at W3C TPAC event so will not be around to dial in tomorrow
>> 
>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, 23:42 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>> Jeni, 
>>> 
>>> we were wondering on the call what a realistic timing for PR transition would be. You hold the keys for that, not only as a chair, but also because we need your JSON and RDF implementation report to secure the minimal requirement for the transition…
>>> 
>>> In view of my own travels, too, here are the dates that would be possible for a PR transition call: 9, 10, 16, 17, 18 November. If we can do one of these, we can publish a PR on the 24th at the latest, with a Rec publication date sometimes mid or end of January. Would these days work for you? Ie, can you commit that your implementation will be ready by then? If so, I will set up a doodle for us plus Ralph and Philippe…
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> P.S. We do have some more implementations in the making, but we do not know whether they will be complete.
>>> 
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C 
>>> Digital Publishing Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 13:22:05 UTC