Re: Timing questions

That is fantastic news, Jeni --- nice work!

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, 20:04 Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to say that this morning I made a PR to report that my
> implementations are passing all the tests, so we now have 2 full
> implementations of everything. I believe that means we can go ahead with
> the transition whenever suits.
>
> I'll let the group know re the call.
>
> Jeni
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, 09:40 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Ping Jeni - any news?
>>
>> BTW Ivan, Jeremy and I are at W3C TPAC event so will not be around to
>> dial in tomorrow
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, 23:42 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Jeni,
>>>
>>> we were wondering on the call what a realistic timing for PR transition
>>> would be. You hold the keys for that, not only as a chair, but also because
>>> we need your JSON and RDF implementation report to secure the minimal
>>> requirement for the transition…
>>>
>>> In view of my own travels, too, here are the dates that would be
>>> possible for a PR transition call: 9, 10, 16, 17, 18 November. If we can do
>>> one of these, we can publish a PR on the 24th at the latest, with a Rec
>>> publication date sometimes mid or end of January. Would these days work for
>>> you? Ie, can you commit that your implementation will be ready by then? If
>>> so, I will set up a doodle for us plus Ralph and Philippe…
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> P.S. We do have some more implementations in the making, but we do not
>>> know whether they will be complete.
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Digital Publishing Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>