Re: Transition to Candidate Recommendation

Thanks.

+1

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> Hi Yakov,
>
> We advertised the request for reviews on the Working Drafts here http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/4619, tweeted it, and asked specific groups to comment. We received comments from I18N, A11y, TAG, and a few individuals.
>
> We’ll be pushing out more, particularly to implementers, during CR.
>
> Jeni
> --
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>
> On 8 July 2015 at 01:01:47, Yakov Shafranovich (yakov-ietf@shaftek.org) wrote:
>> One small question - I notice that CRs need wide review. Have we
>> received sufficient review and input from parties external to the W3C
>> to count for that?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>> > Hello CSV on the Web WG members,
>> >
>> > We are aiming to make a transition to Candidate Recommendation for our four specifications
>> for publication next week, namely:
>> >
>> > - Model for Tabular Data and Metadata on the Web - http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/
>> > - Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data - http://w3c.github.io/csvw/metadata/
>> > - Generating JSON from Tabular Data on the Web - http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2json/
>> > - Generating RDF from Tabular Data on the Web - http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/
>> >
>> > We need a formal resolution of the Working Group to make the transition request.
>> >
>> > If you are a Working Group member, and would like to see these specifications progress
>> to Candidate Recommendation, please respond asap to this message with a +1.
>> >
>> > (+1 from me!)
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Jeni
>> > --
>> > Jeni Tennison
>> > http://www.jenitennison.com/
>> >
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 12:27:32 UTC