- From: Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 14:04:45 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 13:05:34 UTC
On 9 July 2014 10:02, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: As for the core remark: I think the simple answer is: it seems that no use > cases were submitted (so far) that relied on fragment identifiers. If you > have a real-life case for that: please send information to us and we would > be happy to include it! I can think of a use case, where table cells have annotations. When published as CSV (and perhaps even when published as HTML), these annotations should be stored separately, linked to the table cells in some way, rather than as part of the table cell values. The most common example of an annotation of a table cell is footnotes, usually represented as either a symbol: https://peerj.com/articles/432/#table-3 (where an asterisk commonly represents "significant difference") or as a superscript letter, either in a body cell: https://peerj.com/articles/20/#table-2 or in a header cell: https://peerj.com/articles/394/#table-2 Another type of annotation would be formatting, such as italics, as seen in the last column of this table: https://peerj.com/articles/392/#table-5 Alf
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 13:05:34 UTC