- From: Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 23:46:05 +0000
- To: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jeremy, The Peel Sessions data has been published in various formats at different times in the past, though some of them have disappeared from the web by now. There was a data dump at <https://web.archive.org/web/20081023060734/http://bbc-hackday.dyndns.org/> which I think might have been CSV, then an RDF dump, then the current HTML versions at <http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/johnpeel/sessions/>. It would be nice to have a published CSV version to work with again - which is what I was trying to produce, via OpenRefine, hence the use case - but I couldn't figure out the best way to represent multiple, nested values without repeating all the objects multiple times. It seemed like a nice, straightforward example of the kind of thing that CSV (or some other line-oriented format) needs to be able to handle, in one way or another. Once there are some more use cases written up I'll have a go at adapting this one to the same style; if it turns out that one of the other use cases covers the same ground, feel free to delete it. Alf On 25 February 2014 22:10, Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: > Hi Alf – thanks for all the great work so far in coming up with use cases > for our work. > > > > I’ve been looking at the Peel Sessions use case and scratching my head a > little … I’m probably getting the wrong end of the stick, but it sounds as > though this data is not currently published in CSV form. As such it reads a > bit like a wish list of “nice to haves”. What I am hoping to get from the > use cases are clear, concrete examples of where CSV is already the choice of > format for their particular application and/or the limitations of working > with Plain-Old-Tabular-Text (let’s call them “POTT”) files are inhibitors to > productivity. > > > > Is there anything unique about this use case that is not covered elsewhere? > > > > If it does contain unique issues, can you develop this use case further > along the lines discussed previously (narrative style etc.) > > > > Many thanks, Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 23:46:53 UTC