- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 23:58:36 -0400
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Koji, [src] http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/page-flow-direction-002.xht [Shepherd] http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/page-flow-direction-002/ You wrote: " Could we use smaller images? On my PC with my printer, the images are wider than paper and each page is printed on two pages. That's not what we want to test here, correct? " I just stumbled on your comment today. The intrinsic width of the widest image among the 4 images is 651px. I can rearrange the images' intrinsic width to be narrower but the test, as designed, will require that each <div> uses 100% of the available width of document box so that a page break occurs after each <div>. I do not understand why the images could be wider than paper but I do see they seem to be wider than my page setup with Chrome 51 and Chrome 52. My page setup settings for Firefox and Chrome are: Orientation: Portrait, Paper size: US Letter (215.9mm wide by 279.4mm tall), Margins on all 4 sides: 10mm . Both Chrome 52.0.2743.19 and Firefox 49.0a1 buildID=20160531030258 fail that test for different reasons... What is important right now is to check, verify that the test is correctly designed and correctly coded. I'll look at that test and other page-flow-direction tests again... Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 03:59:09 UTC