Re: list-style-position-018 is invalid

Le 2016-07-13 21:02, Gérard Talbot a écrit :
> Le 2016-07-11 18:47, Geoffrey Sneddon a écrit :
>> On 16/10/10 01:31, David Baron wrote:
>>> The following tests:
>>> are invalid because of the first and second sentences after the
>>> first note in the definition of 'outside' in:
>>> (that is, the first and second sentences that are not in the public
>>> draft).
>>> Unfortunately, since I can't find a record of the text in question
>>> on a public mailing list, W3C confidentiality rules prevent me from
>>> quoting the text here.
>>> (I wish our editors drafts were public, but they're not.)
>> These were duly removed by Gérard in
>> <>.
>> As far as I can tell, list-style-position-018 is valid per the 2.1 
>> REC,
>> and I'm not going to try and dig through the MO CVS history to try and
>> find the text David is referring to (at least that's a problem we 
>> don't
>> have any more!). We still don't have interop here, and it seems to be
>> causing some (minor) compat issues, so would be nice to have the test 
>> back.
> David,
> I can resubmit list-style-position-018 test into /source/css21/lists .
> Or I can submit list-style-position-018 test into /source/css-lists-3
> (and I will modify the link to spec accordingly).



[src; reference file]

The original 2010 tests are still here:

Test Format Guidelines

Test Style Guidelines

Test Templates

CSS Naming Guidelines

Test Review Checklist

CSS Metadata

Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 21:16:24 UTC