- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:38:14 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 17:27, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> * dom — sure, I suppose. not very useful for actual browsers, to be fair, so just extra overhead to release tests. > > We can key off of <script> and such instead if needed. I've written tests that use <script> but intentionally don't use the "dom" flag. These were manual tests where the script reduced the amount of manual work required to execute the test, but was optional and the test was still valid if scripts were not supported. Then again, this is sufficiently corner case that I wouldn't object to losing this bit of expressivity, even if I would miss it. - Florian
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 07:38:49 UTC