W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > June 2015

Re: CR+LF or LF?

From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:25:32 +0200
Message-ID: <556EC80C.8030802@gmail.com>
To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Koji,

On 06/03/2015 10:45 AM, Koji Ishii wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Is there a guideline for the use of CR+LF or LF in the test
> suites?
> 
> I'm seeing it's a bit mixed, and it causes showing differences on 
> every import to our repo.
> 
> Should we fix our import script to convert them, or should they be 
> fixed in the CSS WG repo?

FWIW, WPT has a lint script that disallows CRs (with a whitelist for
cases where they're necessary).

HTH
Ms2ger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVbsf8AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2sIAH/jI401knX4X70QK85uJ8a/vu
jWEMjljdfuYsX9ZgwJgJoR12xYeZyLSj4S8s0iJRUNFDXPqUbR4KxvdKQhhKIaUg
fcEZtbio/7MFSJW/n006i/c5QMZVosjuDGCROniMrdR7D+17cSDbiXBux0S0KBJG
ABJkdy9tmbDbSExqM1oGFqT7YFmBmC++vZg+3/AH0ELYdy8onyfM/P7q/cin9cba
U5phTq2NRWhejTTd0jaB9Tz+vzYnGm4GEaBTvs77e0MK87wdZWD+3IwvDbxTFu/p
mbpi5zTHzT+18k4yNzwy41DRmYgAcUZp6aZ42HtgfLS7v/eA6WF/6SDTLmIWh3U=
=8MZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 09:26:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC