- From: Shiozawa, Hajime <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 23:06:07 +0900
- To: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHSwuKMFAeZZSGiFpvi5QQ-ZUc2-Fvj+cNxPxBsWnorXN4A25w@mail.gmail.com>
Gérard, I have fixed incorrect padding. https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/6d9052794a4f Hajime. 2015-07-11 12:37 GMT+09:00 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) < hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>: > Hi Gérard, > > I have fixed inline-block alignment test. > https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/865ca430216b > > <Change Point> > 1. fixed the test while referring to your feedback. > > 2.added other test case > - for central baseline > -- inline-block-alignment-new-003.xht (vertical-lr + mixed) > -- inline-block-alignment-new-004.xht (vertical-rl + upright) > -- inline-block-alignment-new-005.xht (vertical-lr + upright) > - for alphabetical baseline > -- inline-block-alignment-new-007.xht (vertical-lr + sideways) > -- inline-block-alignment-new-008.xht (vertical-rl + sideways-right) > -- inline-block-alignment-new-009.xht (vertical-lr + sideways-right) > -- inline-block-alignment-new-010.xht (vertical-rr + sideways-left) > -- inline-block-alignment-new-011.xht (vertical-lr + sideways-left) > > 3. added ref file > - inline-block-alignment-new-003-ref.xht (for vertical-lr central-baseline) > - inline-block-alignment-new-007-ref.xht (for vertical-lr > alphabetical-baseline) > > Could you review it? > > I have known that sideways-left is at risk now and may be dropped during > the CR period^[1]. > However, anyway, I have created test for sideways-left because deleting > test case is very easy :-) > > [1]: "Status of this document" from > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes-3/ > > The following features are at-risk, and may be dropped during the CR > period: > > * The sideways-left of text-orientation > > * The use-glyph-orientation of text-orientation > > * The digits value of text-combine-upright. > > * The look-ahead/look-behind sequencing rules for > text-combine-upright. > > > Hajime. > > > 2015-07-06 4:30 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>: > >> Le 2015-07-05 02:25, 塩澤 元 a écrit : >> >>> Gérard, >>> >>> I have fixed the inline-block alignement test in reference to your >>> review^[1] >>> >>> https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/4d6bad11f62e >>> >>> Could you review it? >>> >>> After your review and approval, I will create other variation of >>> inline-block alignment. >>> >>> [1]: >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2015Jun/0007.html >>> >>> Hajime. >>> >> >> Here is what I came up with: >> >> >> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/inline-block-alignment-new-002-Hajime.xht >> >> Your test: >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/inline-block-alignment-new-002.xht >> >> 1- (line 15 in your test) >> It's always safer to use a numerical line-height (1) instead of a >> font-size (1em) because computed line-height is inherited by default; a >> numerical line-height will scale with relevant font-size. In your test, 1em >> was okay since other inline boxes were taller. >> >> 2- (lines 24 and 25 in your test) >> Creating an asymetrical vertical padding on inline boxes can better >> reveal an implementation bug. >> I've added a /* comment */ explaining the purpose of such logical >> vertical padding >> >> 3- (line 26 in your test) >> I've removed color: fuchsia. >> >> 4- (line 33 in your test) >> Since line-height is inherited, then you do not need to redeclare it for >> its descendants. >> >> 5- (lines 36 and 41 in your test) >> I've used id instead of classes for first-line-box and last-line-box >> >> 6- (lines 49 and 50 in your test) >> Asymetrical vertical padding on that inline plus a /* comment */ >> >> If you now load that test into the latest most recent Firefox 42 nightly >> build, you can see 2 bugs occuring. The left padding and right padding on >> the inline boxes should not affect baseline alignment of text (the >> horizontal position of those orange squares with respect to the blue >> square) on the dominant baseline... whatever such dominant baseline is and >> however how baseline-alignment is implemented. >> >> Adapted reference file: >> >> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/inline-block-alignment-new-002-Hajime-ref.xht >> >> Gérard >> -- >> Test Format Guidelines >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html >> >> Test Style Guidelines >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html >> >> Test Templates >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html >> >> CSS Naming Guidelines >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html >> >> Test Review Checklist >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html >> >> CSS Metadata >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html >> > > > > -- > # 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) > # mail: hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com > -- # 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) # mail: hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com
Received on Saturday, 11 July 2015 14:06:35 UTC