W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2015

[css-writing-modes-3] Review of orthogonal-parent-shrink-to-fit-001[a-x]

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:51:17 -0500
To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <770c5beef73bd315cd74fdf0a63d743d@gtalbot.org>

I reviewed your 24 orthogonal-parent-shrink-to-fit-001[a-x] tests.


Changes I made:

1- Added <meta charset="utf-8">

2- Added title="7.3. Orthogonal Flows"

3- Added dom flag

4- Added /* height: 3em is not required. IE11 and Edge12 compute height 
to ICB height if
     not set. We want the test to focus exclusively on shrink-to-fit 
algorithm. */

5- XX or XXX have been replaced with HH or HHH; YY has been replaced 
with ZZ . The idea here is, if reviewer disables Ahem font and uses 
font-family: serif, then the glyphs themselves will help a bit to see 
where their respective edges are displayed.

Note that:
- float: right is not tested in those 24 tests
- vertical-lr is not tested in those 24 tests
- table elements are not tested in those 24 tests (I may have some tests 
ready on that)
- inline-table elements are not tested in those 24 tests
- orthogonal-parent-shrink-to-fit-001 has not been reviewed for several 
reasons; I think we should remove such 
orthogonal-parent-shrink-to-fit-001 combo test.


Test Format Guidelines

Test Style Guidelines

Test Templates

CSS Naming Guidelines

Test Review Checklist

CSS Metadata
Received on Wednesday, 23 December 2015 14:51:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC