- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:59:43 -0500
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 2015-12-07 10:26, Koji Ishii a écrit : [snipped] >> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-014.xht >> >> The second (bottom) part of the test is wrong, incorrect. The initial, >> default value of 'text-combine-upright' is 'none'; the initial, >> default >> value of 'text-orientation' is 'mixed'. So, 'sideways' text and >> 'mixed' >> text are compared. >> > > This test is not good, but does not look wrong to me. With Firefox 45.0a1 nightly, try http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/text-orientation-mixed-vs-sideways-002.xht where a) and b) correspond to the code involved in text-orientation-014.xht . Right now, I am not sure how should a sideways-ed latin text be rendered inside a line box whose dominant baseline is central. text-orientation-014.xht also has another issue: the font used is not specified. So, the default system font on the tester's os is involved... while I might have another and different default system font for my os. In this test http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/text-orientation-014-mplus-1p-GT.xht we "fix" (force) the font used. Chrome 49 Canary and Firefox 45 differ... and I think (albeit not sure) Firefox is closer to the correct rendering. Koji, I've sent you another email on text-orientation-mixed-vs-sideways-002.xht Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 17:00:16 UTC