Re: [css-writing-modes-3] text-orientation-mixed-001 , text-orientation-010 , text-orientation-014 tests

Le 2015-12-07 10:26, Koji Ishii a écrit :

[snipped]

>> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-014.xht
>> 
>> The second (bottom) part of the test is wrong, incorrect. The initial,
>> default value of 'text-combine-upright' is 'none'; the initial, 
>> default
>> value of 'text-orientation' is 'mixed'. So, 'sideways' text and 
>> 'mixed'
>> text are compared.
>> 
> 
> This test is not good, but does not look wrong to me.


With Firefox 45.0a1 nightly, try

http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/text-orientation-mixed-vs-sideways-002.xht

where a) and b) correspond to the code involved in 
text-orientation-014.xht . Right now, I am not sure how should a 
sideways-ed latin text be rendered inside a line box whose dominant 
baseline is central.

text-orientation-014.xht also has another issue: the font used is not 
specified. So, the default system font on the tester's os is involved... 
while I might have another and different default system font for my os.

In this test

http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/text-orientation-014-mplus-1p-GT.xht

we "fix" (force) the font used. Chrome 49 Canary and Firefox 45 
differ... and I think (albeit not sure) Firefox is closer to the correct 
rendering.

Koji, I've sent you another email on
text-orientation-mixed-vs-sideways-002.xht

Gérard
-- 
Test Format Guidelines
http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html

Test Style Guidelines
http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html

Test Templates
http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html

CSS Naming Guidelines
http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html

Test Review Checklist
http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html

CSS Metadata
http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html

Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 17:00:16 UTC