2015-12-04 7:43 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>: > Hello, > > > http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-mixed-001.xht > > The reference image must be redone so that it uses a "T" (65332) and not a > "T" (84). > More info: > > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/T-in-text-orientation-mixed-001-test.html I think it's intentional and correct, though I agree that it's not easy to understand. "T" is in FULL WIDTH T to set in upright. If you change it to ASCII T, it must set in sideways, and the test is no longer testing "mixed" value. > http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-010.xht > > The second (bottom) part of the test is wrong, not best, not testing what > it claims to be testing because #test and #control use identical code. The > initial, default value of 'text-combine-upright' is 'none'; the initial, > default value of 'text-orientation' is 'mixed'. > Huh, agree that this test does not make sense, it only makes sense to who understands how it should look, and test and ref are not related. > http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-014.xht > > The second (bottom) part of the test is wrong, incorrect. The initial, > default value of 'text-combine-upright' is 'none'; the initial, default > value of 'text-orientation' is 'mixed'. So, 'sideways' text and 'mixed' > text are compared. > This test is not good, but does not look wrong to me. /kojiReceived on Monday, 7 December 2015 15:27:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC