W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2013

RE: [css3-regions] Comments on content-node-layers-003 , regions-modal-dialog-002 , regions-selection-007 , extract-list-items-012 , etc..

From: Mihai Balan <mibalan@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:16:53 +0100
To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "\"\\\"G?rard Talbot\\\" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>\"@inbound-smtp-1.adobe.com" <"\"G?rard Talbot\" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>"@inbound-smtp-1.adobe.com>
CC: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <32E5AE8565CC6142BA0AAFA5A95697E04D2426710C@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com>
Francois, thanks for your feedback - all comments are pertinent.
I'll ping you back once I rework those tests (hopefully sometime early next week).

Have a nice day,
Mihai

Mihai Balan | Quality Engineer @ Web Engine team |  mibalan@adobe.com | +4-031.413.3653 / x83653 | Adobe Systems Romania


-----Original Message-----
From: François REMY [mailto:francois.remy.dev@outlook.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:04 AM
To: "\"G?rard Talbot\" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>"@inbound-smtp-1.adobe.com
Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list; Mihai Balan; Dirk Schulze
Subject: RE: [css3-regions] Comments on content-node-layers-003 , regions-modal-dialog-002 , regions-selection-007 , extract-list-items-012 , etc..

> François,
>
> I've slightly edited your original email:
> - links to tests commented are included (that's very useful)
> - the email subject line is more descriptive and will be useful 
> if/when searching in archives. Ideally, the email subject line should 
> always have the filename of tests discussed. So, if your email makes 
> comments on a lot of tests, then maybe it's best to break it into a few emails.

Ok, thanks for the tips, I'll try to remember that for the next time.




> when you go to
>
> http://test.csswg.org/harness/suite/css-regions-1_dev/

>
> do you see a select box with "in most needed order" ... which can be 
> set to "in alphabetical order" ?

Yes. That would have been useful indeed :-)




> none of them have been reviewed [already]

At least hopefully by now there are comments to help fix them and make the upcoming review process easier. 		 	   		  
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 14:17:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:19 UTC