- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:42:00 -0400
- To: "Rebecca Hauck" <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Leif Arne Storset" <lstorset@opera.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Tantek Çelik" <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, "Jorrit Vermeiren" <jorritv@opera.com>, "Giuseppe Pascale" <giuseppep@opera.com>
Le Mar 16 juillet 2013 16:24, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : > Hi Leif, > > I took a look and added comments on the commit in Github: > > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/commit/f394a9f65071d53b4f5b74d5dd8b14d9d0 > 96f2e6 > > > Other than the few minor changes I suggested, they look good. > > Cheers, > -Rebecca Rebecca, " This test passes for me on a UA that does not support this property. You can add an intermediate step to first verify the property is supported. " contributors/opera/submitted/css3-ui/nav-dir-target-006.html I have in the past also criticized some tests for not being designed to fail when the test is testing an invalid syntax (or invalid declaration) and when an UA does not support a property. I think this issue should be clarified. Eg. http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/CSS3-CONDITIONAL_DEV/ shows that IE10 scores 21% but, in reality, the only tests IE10 passes are those testing invalid syntax causing parsing errors. Some CSS2.1 and CSS3 tests will actually be passed by buggy or old browsers (say, Netscape 4 or IE4). I think this is wrong. ----------- Opera has now 2 accounts: http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/testcase/spec/css-ui-3/author/opera_software/ will return "No Assets Found." while http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/testcase/spec/css-ui-3/author/opera/ will return "15 Test Cases Found". I think there should be only 1 Opera account. ------------ http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/opera/submitted/css3-ui/nav-dir-001.html " First, use directional navigation to navigate the focus to the "START" link below. Test passes if navigating left once moves the focus to the "FINISH" link. " I have no idea if this is possible... but is it possible to make the wording of pass-fail conditions sentences in tests like those to be less technical? I am asking because I really do not know this. I am using Opera 12.16 and I have no idea what exactly I must do in such test. ------------ Rebecca, your comments in github.com/w3c/csswg-test/commit are not "echoed" into Shepherd system. I believe comments on tests should not be scattered around. Gérard > On 7/16/13 8:33 AM, "Leif Arne Storset" <lstorset@opera.com> wrote: > >>We have submitted tests [1] for the directional focus navigation >>properties [2]. This completes ACTION-565. First tests for level 3 of >> CSS >> >>UI, yay! >> >>My colleague Jorrit Vermeiren wrote them and I have reviewed them. It >>might be good to have external review as well, so I'm leaving them in >> the >> >>'submitted' directory. >> >>[1] In Shepherd: >>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/testcase/spec/css-ui-3/section/9.2.2 >>/ >> In Mercurial: http://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/5e6e446ba1db >>[2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui/#nav-dir >> >>-- >>Leif Arne Storset >>Opera Software >> > > > -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 23:42:33 UTC